Fox has done the world two great injustices in canceling first Joss Whedon’s sublime series Firefly and now his intriguing show Dollhouse. Since the final few episodes of Dollhouse are now airing, this seems the right time to reconsider the show and what it suggests about human nature and the technologies of tomorrow.This time around, Whedon takes us a handful of years into the future, to an America where things look familiar on the surface, but more and more of the people one meets are actually “dolls” — persons whose memories have been erased and identities overwritten by an organization that hires them out to very rich clients to be used as anything from sexual playthings to foster mothers. After each “engagement” the doll returns to be wiped clean and imprinted (that is, reprogrammed) for the next encounter. While the show does tacitly condemn this new form of slavery, Whedon is sensitive to the potential appeal of the imagined technology. In a piece about Dollhouse in the transhumanist magazine H+ a couple of months ago, Erik Davis noted that
The show’s ambivalence about such “posthuman” technologies is captured by the character who does all the wiping and remixing: a smug, immature, and charmingly nerdish wetware genius named Topher Brink [pictured at right above], whose simultaneously dopey and snarky incarnation by the actor Fran Kranz reflects the weird mix of arrogance and creative exuberance that inform so much manipulative neuroscience.
Despite the technology’s potential appeal, Dollhouse has also from the beginning emphasized the potential for abuse of the “doll” technology. In the third episode, Paul Ballard (our hero FBI agent), predicted disaster: “We split the atom; we make a bomb. We come up with anything new, the first thing we do is — destroy, manipulate, control. It’s human nature.” And the Season One finale gives us a glimpse of how things will turn out in Whedon’s fictional world: the episode shows a flashforward to 2019, when Los Angeles is in flames and a ragged band of survivors recoils in horror from any “tech” they find that might house a computer chip.
As the series progresses, the original “bad guys” of the L.A. dollhouse, whom we have been brought to see as complicated human beings with mostly good intentions, have been increasingly pitted against their superiors in the aptly-named Rossum Corporation whose intoxication with the power of their technology has become total. Whedon strongly implies a slippery slope here: At first, dolls were coerced but still nominally volunteers for a period of indentured servitude; in time, their masters grow reluctant to uphold their end of the bargain, unwilling to relinquish power.
Whereas Whedon’s Firefly, with its horses and handguns, turned to romanticism in its effort to reach an accord between modernity and tradition, Dollhouse explores the dangers of new technology without (so far) offering a way out. After all, “it’s human nature” that is the problem here; the technology is merely an expression and culmination of our natural desire to control. In his H+ piece, Davis says that “all of us are dolls sometimes, and dollhouse engineers other times” — in other words, manipulation, whether accomplished through political, theological, or emotional means, is part and parcel of the human experience. Davis has a point. But rather than suggesting that flawed human nature need be remade from scratch, Dollhouse compellingly depicts how the desire to remake our selves and our world can lead to a dismal deal with the devil: Topher sacrifices all the comforts of a normal life for the opportunity to pursue his research and refine his skills on live subjects. But when he comes to see his subjects not as toys but as people, his conscience leads him to join with those who are attempting to put the genie back into the bottle and contain the technology he helped create, vainly striving to undo the harm that has been done. “You’re human,” Topher says to one of his creations in an attempt to comfort her when she cannot cope with the discovery that she is a doll. Her rebuke also serves as a warning to those who think they can improve upon humanity: “Don’t flatter yourself.”– Brian J. Boyd
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
The View from the Dollhouse
[NOTE: From time to time we will invite guests to contribute to Futurisms. Our first guest post, below, comes from Brian J. Boyd, a graduate student at Oxford and a former New Atlantis intern.]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bloggers
Charles T. Rubin, New Atlantis contributing editor.
Adam Keiper, New Atlantis editor.
Ari N. Schulman, New Atlantis senior editor.
Brendan Foht, New Atlantis assistant editor.
About
Blogroll
Related essays
by Charles T. Rubin
- Machine Morality and Human Responsibility
- Beyond Mankind
- Why Be Human?
- Our Bodies, Ourselves
- The Rhetoric of Extinction
- Man or Machine?
- Artificial Intelligence and Human Nature
by Adam Keiper
by Adam Keiper and Ari N. Schulman
by Ari N. Schulman
by other authors
- Humanism and Transhumanism (Fred Baumann)
- The Trouble with the Turing Test (Mark Halpern)
- Disenchanting Determinism (Caitrin Nicol)
- The Anti-Theology of the Body (David B. Hart)
- Ageless Bodies, Happy Souls (Leon R. Kass)
- Transitional Humanity (Gilbert Meilaender)
- Till Malfunction Do Us Part (Caitrin Nicol)
- Methuselah and Us (Diana Schaub)
Frequently-Used Tags
"There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom"
1984
2001
30 Rock
Aaron Saenz
Abraham Lincoln
academia
addiction
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
aesthetics
Agnes Heller
AI
Al Jazeera
Alan Jacobs
Alan Rubenstein
Alasdair MacIntyre
Alcor
Alex Backer
Alex Knapp
Allen Buchanan
Amy Gutmann
Ana Maria Cuervo
Anders Sandberg
Andrew Hessel
animal uplift
Anna Salamon
anti-progress
Apple
argument from inevitability
argument from infallibility
Aristotle
art
Arthur C. Clarke
artifacts
Artificial intelligence
artificial life
artificial wombs
Asilomar
assisted reproductive technology
Aubrey de Grey
Audrey Hepburn
augmented reality
authenticity
automation
autonomy
Avatar
avian flu
beauty
behavioral science
Ben Goertzel
Benjamin Storey
Beyond Therapy
Big Dog
Bill Joy
bioethics
bionics
body image
body modification
Brad Templeton
Bradley Allenby
Bradley J. Thames
Brain Preservation Foundation
brain scans
brain uploading
brain-computer interfaces
Brandon Keim
Brave New World
breathing
Brian Christian
Brian Malow
Bryan Caplan
C.S. Lewis
Caprica
cats
cell phones
character
Charles Taylor
children
Christianity
Christine Rosen
Christmas
cloning
CNN
coercion
cognitive computing
cognitive enhancement
cognitive liberty
comments
commercials
communication technologies
compression
computational biology
Condorcet
consciousness
constant connection
creativity
cryonics
cyborg
Cynthia Kenyon
Dale Carrico
Daniel Sarewitz
Daniel Sportiello
Darlene Cavalier
DARPA
David A. Noebel
David Benatar
David Chalmers
David F. Noble
David Foster Wallace
David Gelernter
David Pearce
David Rose
death
Deep Blue
democracy
Derek Parfit
design
designer babies
despair
despotism
dictators
disability
distraction
distributive justice
diversity
Down syndrome
dualism
e-memory
e-readers
Earth
eclipse
economics
Ed Boyden
Ed Regis
efficiency
Eliezer Yudkowsky
ELIZA
embodiment
empathy
enhancement
Enlightenment
entropy
environmentalism
equality of access
Eric Drexler
ethics
eugenics
everyday life
evolution
evolutionary psychology
existential risks
extropy
eyes in the back of your head
Facebook
faith
fantasy
fashion
faux caution
fiction
Fight Aging
Fixed
Flannery O'Connor
Foresight Institute
Fort Hood
Frances Willard
Fred Baumann
French Revolution
friendly AI
Futurism (art)
Futurisms
futuristic distance
gaming
Gary Drescher
Gary Marcus
Gary Wolf
geoengineering
George Dvorsky
George Orwell
Gilbert Meilaender
Gizmodo
global warming
gloomy
God
goodness
Google
Gordon Bell
government
GPS
Great Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition
Greg Benford
Gregor Wolbring
Gregory Benford
Gödel
H+ magazine
H+ Summit 2010
Halloween
Hank Hyena
Hans Moravec
heartbreak
Heather Knight
Heidegger
history
holism
hubris
human excellence
human extinction
human life
human nature
human significance
humanism
humanities
humanoid robotics
humor
Iain M. Banks
Ian Pearson
IEET
immortality
infanticide
IQ
Irfan Khawaja
Isaac Asimov
Isaac Newton
Itamar Arel
IVF
J. M. Bernstein
Jamais Cascio
James Hughes
James Jorasch
James W. Wagner
Japan
Jason Furman
Jason Robert
Jende Andrew Huang
Jeopardy
Jesse Schell
Jessica Scorpio
Jill Lepore
John Ruskin
John Singer Sargent
John Smart
Jonah Lehrer
Joseph Weizenbaum
journalism
joy
Judaism
Juergen Schmidhuber
Julian Savulescu
Katja Grace
Ken Hayworth
Kevin Jain
Kevin Kelly
Kindle
kissing
Kyle Munkittrick
L5 Society
lambda calculus
Lauren Silbert
law of accelerating returns
lay science
Leon Kass
Leon R. Kass
Lepht Anonym
liberalism
libertarian transhumanism
libertarianism
life extension
lifelogging
linguistics
Lisa Katayama
literature
loneliness
Lost
Ludwig Wittgenstein
MacIntyre Conference
mainstream
man as beast
Marcus Hutter
Marilynne Robinson
Mark Gubrud
Mark Walker
Martine Rothblatt
Marxism
Maryanne Wolf
materialism
Matthew Crawford
Max More
memory
Methuselah Foundation
Methuselarity
Michael Anissimov
Michael Nielsen
Michael Pollan
Mike Treder
Milan Kundera
military
Millie Ray
mind as computer
Mind Children
mind control
minds
Modern Times
molecular manufacturing
moral relativism
morality
morphological freedom
Morris Johnson
multitasking
nanotechnology
NASA
Natasha Vita-More
National Geographic
National Nanotechnology Initiative
natural rights
Neal Stephenson
Ned Seeman
neuro-everything
neurobiology
neuroengineering
neuroscience
Never Say Die conference
New America Foundation
Nick Bostrom
Nick Carr
Nietzsche
Nikki Olson
Nikolai Fyodorov
Noah Goodman
normativity
nuclear weapons
Olympics
ontological fortitude
P. W. Singer
paradox of choice
parenthood
Patrick Hopkins
Patrick Lin
Patrick McGuire
pattern-identity
personal identity
personhood
Peter A. Lawler
Peter Singer
Peter Thiel
philosophy of mind
photography
plastic surgery
plastination
politics
postmodernism
predation
President's Council on Bioethics
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
progress
progressivism
psychology
public relations
quantum computing
racism
Radiohead
Ramez Naam
Randal Koene
rationality
Ray Kurzweil
recommended reading
regulation
religion
relinquishment
repugnance
resentment watch
response to critics
resurrection
rhetoric of inevitability
Richard Feynman
Rick Weiss
rights
ritual
Robert Ettinger
Robin Hanson
robotics
robots
Roger Holzberg
Roger Scruton
romance
Ron Bailey
Ron Fouchier
S. Jay Olshansky
Santa Claus
science
science fiction
scientific enterprise
scientism
scientists
secrecy
sectarianism
seduction community
self-driving cars
September 11
Seth Lloyd
sex
sex selection
sexual enhancement
Sherry Turkle
simulation
Singularitarianism
Singularity
Singularity Hub
Singularity Summit
Singularity University
Slate
sleep
smart phones
SMBC
social interaction
social robotics
society
Sonia Arrison
Sorites paradox
space
space colonization
space exploration
sports
Star Trek
Star Wars
stem cell research
Stephen Cave
Stephen Johnston
Stephen Wolfram
Steve Sailer
Steve Talbott
Stuart Hameroff
substrate chauvinism
suffering
superstition
suspended animation
systems
tacos
Tao
Tea Party movement
Techno-Human Condition
Ted Fishman
Ted Goertzel
Teddy Ruxpin
terrorism
The New York Times
The New Yorker
The Prospect of Immortality
the rhetoric of extinction
thinking
thought experiments
Tim Tyler
Time magazine
Tocqueville
Todd May
totalitarianism
transhumanism
transhumanist tech fail
translation
travel
Turing Machines
Turing Test
TV
Twitter
Tyler Cowen
tyranny
UAVs
uncanny valley
unemployment
uploading
USVs
utilitarianism
Utopia
UUVs
virtual reality
virtues
Wafaa Bilal
Walker Percy
Walter Kirn
Watson
we are already x
whole-brain emulation
William Dickens
Wired
wisdom
women's lib
XKCD
Yuval Levin
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(24)
-
►
March
(8)
- Arguing with Transhumanists
- More Problems with Jonah Lehrer’s Science Reportin...
- Examining the Moral Meaning of Memory
- Jonah Lehrer’s Errors on Memory and Forgetting
- Seeing and Believing
- The Radical Cowardice of Utilitarian Bioethics
- The False Boldness of “After-Birth Abortion”
- The Revolution Will Be Advertisement
-
►
February
(8)
- The Future Gets In Your Eyes
- Ray Kurzweil for Leader of Antiquated Tribal Polit...
- Marilynne Robinson on Alasdair MacIntyre: Where’s ...
- Does Evolution Create Harmonious Balance or Messy ...
- “Liberal Education Deserves a Whole Lifetime”
- Against Medical Ethics?
- Forcing People to Be Good
- How to Solve the Future
-
►
March
(8)
-
►
2011
(46)
-
►
September
(11)
- Manufacturing Freedom
- A Posthuman Art Exhibit
- IBM’s New “Cognitive Computing” Processor
- Link Roundup: The Singularity, Friendly AI, and Te...
- Computerized Translation and Resurrecting the Dead...
- Robin Hanson on Why We Should “Forget 9/11”
- Parental Goodness versus Efficiency
- Why Aren’t Transhumanists More Successful at Love?...
- History, 9/11 Relics, and “Technological Superstit...
- Transhumanists: The Once and Future Christians?
- Immortality, pro and con
-
►
August
(8)
- The Varieties of Transhumanist Experience
- “Fixed” — A New Documentary on Disability and Tran...
- A Real Human Future
- Seven Scenarios for the Decline of Transhumanism
- Humanist confused
- Appearance as a Guide to Moral Character: Does Rea...
- Manned Space Exploration Goes West: Oklahoma, OK!
- Bradey J. Thames on Virtuous Authenticity: I Just ...
-
►
September
(11)
| 


This time around, Whedon takes us a handful of years into the future, to an America where things look familiar on the surface, but more and more of the people one meets are actually “dolls” — persons whose memories have been erased and identities overwritten by an organization that hires them out to very rich clients to be used as anything from sexual playthings to foster mothers. After each “engagement” the doll returns to be wiped clean and imprinted (that is, reprogrammed) for the next encounter. While the show does tacitly condemn this new form of slavery, Whedon is sensitive to the potential appeal of the imagined technology. In



0 comments:
Post a Comment
[Basic HTML tags can be used in this comment field. Comments are moderated for civility and relevance and will not appear until the blog's editors have approved them.]